Can You Pursue a Personal Injury Claim for Emotional Distress Alone?
When an accident or harmful event occurs, the impact isn’t always physical. Emotional distress—such as anxiety, depression, insomnia, or post-traumatic stress—can be just as debilitating as any visible injury.
Basso Law PC works with people who’ve been deeply affected by psychological harm and need legal guidance to determine whether pursuing a personal injury claim based solely on emotional suffering is possible. The firm serves communities throughout Rhode Island, including Providence and Newport. If you’re dealing with this challenge, contact the firm to discuss your situation and take the first step in protecting your rights.
Emotional distress refers to psychological harm that affects a person’s daily life, well-being, and overall health. Courts and lawyers often look at whether this harm has measurable impacts on a person’s ability to function.
Common examples of emotional distress include:
Persistent anxiety: Ongoing nervousness, panic attacks, or fear tied to the incident.
Depression symptoms: Feelings of hopelessness, withdrawal from loved ones, or loss of interest in everyday activities.
Sleep disruptions: Insomnia, recurring nightmares, or inability to rest due to the effects of trauma.
Physical manifestations: Headaches, stomach issues, or fatigue that directly result from emotional strain.
These signs help demonstrate the seriousness of the harm and create a connection between the distress and the triggering event. Transitioning from this concept, it’s important to look at how emotional distress fits into the broader category of personal injury claims.
A personal injury claim is traditionally thought of in connection with physical harm. However, many courts recognize that psychological suffering can exist on its own or alongside bodily injury.
When combined with physical harm: Emotional distress often strengthens a case since it adds another layer of damages. For instance, someone who breaks a leg in a car accident may also develop anxiety about driving.
When standing alone: Pursuing a claim based solely on emotional distress is more challenging. The claimant usually needs strong evidence to show that the distress is real, severe, and caused by the defendant’s actions.
The difference between these two approaches lies in how courts view tangible versus intangible injuries. While physical wounds are easier to prove with medical records, psychological harm requires a deeper look into evidence such as therapy notes, professional diagnoses, and testimony.
Whether someone can bring a personal injury claim for emotional distress alone often depends on the legal standards applied in their jurisdiction. Courts generally separate emotional distress claims into two categories:
Intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED): This arises when a person deliberately behaves outrageously, knowing it’s likely to cause severe mental suffering.
Negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED): This happens when someone's negligence causes psychological harm to another person, even if it wasn’t intentional.
Each state has its own rules for proving these claims. Some require the presence of a physical injury or being in a “zone of danger,” while others allow standalone emotional distress claims if there’s credible evidence of mental harm.
Because emotional distress isn’t visible, evidence becomes the cornerstone of any claim. A claimant usually needs to provide more than just their personal statement.
Types of evidence that strengthen a personal injury claim for emotional distress include medical documentation, such as records from doctors, psychiatrists, or psychologists confirming a diagnosis. Therapy records, specifically notes from counseling sessions, can also demonstrate ongoing treatment.
Additionally, a medication history showing proof of prescribed antidepressants, anti-anxiety medication, or sleep aids can be vital. Witness statements from friends, family, or colleagues about visible changes in the claimant’s behavior can also be used as evidence.
Finally, employment records documenting missed work, reduced performance, or job loss tied to the distress can further strengthen the claim.
Gathering this kind of evidence helps verify the seriousness of the emotional harm and its connection to the defendant’s conduct. Moving forward, it’s important to see how courts measure damages once evidence is presented.
Calculating emotional distress damages is more complicated than tallying medical bills for physical injuries. Courts usually consider multiple factors to determine what is fair.
Severity of the harm: Mild stress may not lead to significant damage, but severe depression or post-traumatic stress can warrant substantial awards.
Duration of suffering: Short-term distress might be viewed differently from symptoms that last for years.
Impact on daily life: If distress affects work, relationships, or health, the potential for damage may increase.
Supporting evidence: Strong medical records and testimony can influence how damages are calculated.
This evaluation mirrors the broader approach courts take with any personal injury claim, focusing on fairness and measurable impact.
While the law allows for emotional distress claims, proving them without a physical injury can be especially challenging. Courts are often cautious about awarding damages based on intangible harm.
Challenges include skepticism from courts, as judges may hesitate without solid evidence. Higher evidentiary standards often require medical and professional documentation. Additionally, the subjective nature of emotional distress—unlike a tangible injury like a broken bone—varies greatly from person to person.
Because of these challenges, it’s often helpful to work with a lawyer who can guide the claimant in gathering and presenting the strongest possible case.
Certain circumstances make it more likely that an emotional distress claim will succeed on its own.
Cases involving intentional harm: If someone is stalked, harassed, or threatened, emotional harm is often the central issue.
Witnessing traumatic events: In some jurisdictions, bystanders who watch a loved one suffer a serious injury may bring a claim for their own emotional distress.
Events with long-lasting trauma: Incidents like wrongful death, abuse, or severe harassment can create lasting psychological damage.
In these situations, the emotional harm isn’t secondary—it’s the primary injury, making it more compelling for the courts.
Transitioning from the role of the lawyer, it’s helpful to compare emotional distress claims with physical injury claims. While both fall under the umbrella of personal injury claims, they differ in significant ways.
Ease of proof: Physical injuries often come with medical imaging and treatment records, while emotional distress requires more subjective evidence.
Public perception: Juries may be more sympathetic toward visible injuries, though awareness of mental health is growing.
Damages awarded: Emotional distress damages can sometimes equal or exceed physical damages if the harm is severe and long-lasting.
This comparison highlights why emotional distress cases require careful preparation and strong supporting documentation.
For someone considering a personal injury claim based solely on emotional harm, a structured approach can be helpful.
These steps often include:
Seek medical care: A professional diagnosis helps confirm the distress and ties it to the incident.
Document symptoms: Maintaining a journal of daily challenges creates a personal record.
Gather outside testimony: Ask loved ones or colleagues to document changes they’ve noticed.
Consult a lawyer: Legal guidance can clarify whether the case is viable under local law.
Following these steps builds a foundation for moving forward with a claim.
Bringing a personal injury claim for emotional distress alone is possible, but it comes with unique challenges. Substantial evidence, medical documentation, and professional legal guidance are often essential. Attorney Jessica Basso provides reliable legal services across the state of Rhode Island. Contact Basso Law PC today to discuss whether your circumstances support pursuing an emotional distress claim and how you can move forward with your case.