Can You Still File a Personal Injury Claim if You Were Partially at Fault?

Personal injury cases often involve intricate circumstances, including situations where the injured party shares some responsibility for the incident. Understanding how fault impacts the ability to file a claim is essential for those seeking compensation after an accident.
Whether the injury stems from a car crash, slip and fall, or another scenario, Attorney Jessica L. Basso, ESQ is dedicated to helping clients traverse the legal process and protecting their rights.
In cases where partial fault is involved, specific rules determine whether compensation is still available. Comparative negligence laws play a crucial role in these cases, and knowing how they apply can make a significant difference in the outcome. It’s essential to hire a law firm in Providence, Rhode Island, to get reliable representation.
Comparative negligence is a legal principle used to allocate fault among all parties involved in an accident. This approach allows individuals who are partially at fault to still recover compensation, though the amount may be reduced based on their share of fault.
There are three primary types of comparative negligence systems used in the United States:
Pure comparative negligence: In this system, an individual can recover damages even if they’re 99% at fault. The compensation is reduced by the percentage of fault assigned to them.
Modified comparative negligence (50% bar rule): Under this rule, an individual can recover damages only if their share of fault is less than 50%. If they’re 50% or more at fault, they can’t recover compensation.
Modified comparative negligence (51% bar rule): Similar to the 50% rule, this system bars recovery if the individual’s fault is 51% or greater.
Assigning fault in personal injury cases involves reviewing evidence, witness statements, and professional opinions. Factors considered include:
Actions leading to the accident: Determining whether any party acted negligently or violated laws.
Contributory actions: Assessing if the injured party’s actions contributed to the incident.
Applicable laws: Understanding state-specific comparative negligence rules.
Attorney Jessica L. Basso, ESQ, carefully analyzes these factors to determine how comparative negligence laws apply to each client’s situation.
Partial fault can arise in a variety of personal injury cases. Understanding common scenarios helps illustrate how comparative negligence works.
In a car accident, partial fault might include:
Distracted driving: An injured driver who was texting when another vehicle ran a red light.
Speeding: A speeding driver who is struck by another vehicle making an illegal turn.
Failure to signal: An injured driver who failed to use their turn signal but was rear-ended by another car.
In slip and fall cases, partial fault scenarios include:
Ignoring warning signs: An individual who slips on a wet floor despite visible caution signs.
Improper footwear: Wearing inappropriate shoes that increase the likelihood of slipping.
Not paying attention: A person distracted by their phone who fails to notice uneven flooring.
Partial fault in workplace injuries might involve:
Disregarding safety protocols: An employee who fails to use required safety equipment.
Neglecting training: An individual who didn’t follow training procedures when operating machinery.
Horseplay: Engaging in behavior unrelated to work that contributes to an accident.
These examples show how fault can be shared and still allow for a claim to proceed under comparative negligence laws.
When an individual shares responsibility for an accident, their compensation is typically reduced based on their percentage of fault. Calculating this amount involves understanding the total damages and applying the relevant reduction.
Calculate total damages: Add up all losses, including medical bills, lost wages, property damage, and non-economic damages like pain and suffering.
Assign fault percentages: Determine the percentage of fault attributed to each party involved.
Apply the reduction: Subtract the percentage of fault from the total damages to calculate the final compensation amount.
A car accident victim incurs $100,000 in damages but is found 20% at fault. Under comparative negligence rules, their compensation is reduced by 20%, leaving them eligible to recover $80,000.
By carefully evaluating damages and fault, Attorney Jessica L. Basso, ESQ, assures clients understand how their share of responsibility affects potential compensation.
Even when partial fault is involved, building a strong case is crucial to securing compensation. Effective legal representation focuses on gathering evidence, countering opposing arguments, and demonstrating the other party’s liability.
Thorough documentation: Collecting medical records, accident reports, and photos of the scene.
Eyewitness accounts: Statements from witnesses who can corroborate the injured party’s version of events.
Professional testimony: Input from professionals like accident reconstructionists or medical professionals to support the claim.
Legal knowledge: Understanding comparative negligence laws and applying them effectively.
Demonstrating the other party’s negligence
Providing clear evidence of liability
Challenging inaccurate fault assessments
These efforts help strengthen the injured party’s position and maximize their potential recovery.
Filing a personal injury claim promptly is essential, especially when comparative negligence is involved. Delays can jeopardize evidence, witness availability, and the overall strength of the case.
Preserving evidence: Physical evidence like vehicle damage or hazardous conditions can degrade over time.
Meeting deadlines: Statutes of limitations impose strict deadlines for filing personal injury claims.
Securing witness testimony: Witness recollections may fade, making prompt action crucial for accurate accounts.
By acting quickly, injured parties can protect their rights and build a more compelling case.
Failing to file within the statute of limitations can result in:
Loss of the right to pursue compensation
Difficulty in gathering reliable evidence
Limited legal options for resolving the case
Acting within the legal time frame strengthens a claim and assures all avenues for recovery remain open.
Personal injury cases involving partial fault require a comprehensive understanding of the law and a strategic approach to advocacy. Attorney Jessica L. Basso, ESQ, provides valuable assistance in managing these challenging cases.
Case evaluation: Identifying the strengths and weaknesses of a claim.
Legal guidance: Explaining comparative negligence rules and their application.
Representation: Advocating for fair compensation in negotiations or court proceedings.
With a commitment to protecting clients’ rights, Basso Law LLC assures that injured parties receive the support they need to pursue justice.
Some cases involve complications such as:
Multiple liable parties
Insurance disputes
Questions about evidence admissibility
Addressing these factors effectively requires experienced legal representation and a clear strategy.
Attorney Jessica L. Basso, ESQ, takes a proactive approach to addressing disputes with insurance companies or opposing parties. By engaging in negotiations early and presenting strong evidence, many cases are resolved without the need for prolonged litigation. However, if court proceedings are necessary, clients receive comprehensive representation to achieve a favorable outcome.
If partial fault has left you uncertain about your ability to file a personal injury claim, Basso Law LLC can provide clarity and assistance. The firm serves clients across Rhode Island, including Providence, Newport, and the surrounding areas. Contact Attorney Jessica L. Basso, ESQ to discuss your case and take the first step toward recovery.